[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYROSGUGk7h8conA@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:40:08 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] Add support for the Mobileye EyeQ5 SoC
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > However, while waiting for your feedback on Jiaxun's part, I will
> > attempt to add a new platform to assess exactly what the implications
> > are.
>
> Is it possible for you to apply the first patch of this series, which is
> only a fix?
I had this already in my mind and done it just a few minutes ago.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists