[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYWFlYlDimdP2S2A@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:48:21 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] device property: Modify fwnode irq_get() to use
resource
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 04:52:15PM -0700, Mark Hasemeyer wrote:
> > Both acpi_irq_get() and of_irq_to_resourece() use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
> > instead. I don't see why fwnode_irq_get_resource() shouldn't do the same.
> >
> > With this changed,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > In fact this should have always been the case for fwnode_irq_get(). I
> > wouldn't mind changing that, too, in a separate patch.
>
> Sure. It looks like fwnode_iomap(), fwnode_irq_get(),
> fwnode_irq_get_byname(), and fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint() could all
> be updated. I'll add another patch with these changes unless there's a
> reason some of those functions shouldn't be GPL'd?
Interesting... Once should look at the history of those changes.
I don't think anything prevents us from moving to GPLed versions.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists