[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231222104841.1d1b306c989070f82c672d89@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:48:41 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Linux
selftests <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/selftests: Add ownership modification tests
for eventfs
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:28:13 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:21:48 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > The testcase itself is OK but is there any way to identify the system
> > supports eventfs or not? I ran this test on v6.5.13 for checking then
> > it failed. We may need to skip (unsupported) this test for such case.
>
> Hmm, honestly, it should technically work on all past versions.
>
> I'll try it out to see what fails for 6.5.13. Perhaps there was another bug
> that the stable releases need fixing for?
I found that the failure was my environmental issue.
BTW, for busybox environment,
+instance="foo-$(mktemp -u XXXXX)"
This doesn't work. it needs XXXXXX (6 times X). And this is
somewhat wrong usage of mktemp because it can not check there is
foo-<random>.
What about change it as
instance="$(mktemp -u foo-XXXXXX)"
?
Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists