linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: cdev: Split line_get_debounce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZYWYZ6Ys3hSb4IOe@rigel>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:08:39 +0800
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: cdev: Split line_get_debounce_period()
 and use

On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 02:37:43PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:56 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> >

> > > > And you could've included me in the Cc so I didn't just find it by
> > > > accident.
> > >
> > > Maybe it's time to add you to the MAINTAINERS for this file as a designated
> > > reviewer?
> > >
> >
> > You are patching my recent change that you yourself reviewed only days
> > ago. I would think that you would Cc me whether I were a maintainer or
> > not as I'm very likely to have relevant feedback.
>
> On that note: do you see yourself as a full GPIO reviewer or do you
> prefer I split out the uAPI part into a separate section in
> MAINTAINERS and nominate you as its maintainer?
>

Not sure I'm comfortable with either.

Definitely not full GPIO.  I don't feel sufficiently familiar with GPIO
and the related subsystems to qualify.

Splitting out cdev and the uAPI makes more sense to me, but in my mind at
least even that requires a level of commitment higher than the rather
spotty attention I've been providing recently.
I'm more inclined to leave it as is.

Cheers,
Kent.