linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: cdev: Split line_get_debounce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACMJSeu-bS+MpP8HCcD74w0j6vFt821bpgth5LHpqq-fHnEe1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:09:54 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: cdev: Split line_get_debounce_period()
 and use

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 15:08, Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 02:37:43PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:56 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
>
> > > > > And you could've included me in the Cc so I didn't just find it by
> > > > > accident.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it's time to add you to the MAINTAINERS for this file as a designated
> > > > reviewer?
> > > >
> > >
> > > You are patching my recent change that you yourself reviewed only days
> > > ago. I would think that you would Cc me whether I were a maintainer or
> > > not as I'm very likely to have relevant feedback.
> >
> > On that note: do you see yourself as a full GPIO reviewer or do you
> > prefer I split out the uAPI part into a separate section in
> > MAINTAINERS and nominate you as its maintainer?
> >
>
> Not sure I'm comfortable with either.
>
> Definitely not full GPIO.  I don't feel sufficiently familiar with GPIO
> and the related subsystems to qualify.
>
> Splitting out cdev and the uAPI makes more sense to me, but in my mind at
> least even that requires a level of commitment higher than the rather
> spotty attention I've been providing recently.
> I'm more inclined to leave it as is.
>

I can still split the uAPI files into their own section, make Linus
and myself maintainers and make you a reviewer, how about that?

Bart

> Cheers,
> Kent.