linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: remove reg and reg-name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 19:43:01 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, festevam@...il.com,
 helgaas@...nel.org, hongxing.zhu@....com, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
 kernel@...gutronix.de, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, kw@...ux.com,
 l.stach@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-imx@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 lpieralisi@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: remove reg and reg-name

On 23/12/2023 04:46, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 04:50:33PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 04:36:09PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
>>> snps,dw-pcie.yaml already have reg and reg-name information. Needn't
>>> duplciate here.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>>     Change from v4 to v5
>>>     - add Rob's Acked
>>
>> Err, that was intended for patch 9, not this one. This patch should be 
>> dropped.
> 
> Sorry, will correct it.
> 
> Actually I want to move it under Allof
> 
> if compatiable string (A, B, C...)
> then
> 	reg-names:
> 		-const: dbi
> 		-const: config
> 
> Differece SOC have difference reg-names required list. If split it, it
> will be easy when add new SOC. Needn't change two place.
> 
> Let me update at next version.
> 

This patch should be dropped. Why do you remove entries from top-level?
Are they defined in other schema?

Best regards,
Krzysztof