[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231223184412.25598-1-tintinm2017@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 00:14:13 +0530
From: attreyee-muk <tintinm2017@...il.com>
To: bhelgaas@...gle.com,
corbet@....net
Cc: attreyee-muk <tintinm2017@...il.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/PCI: fix spelling mistake in boot-interrupts
Correct to “re-enabled” from “reenabled”.
Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@...il.com>
---
Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst b/Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst
index 2ec70121bfca..931077bb0953 100644
--- a/Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst
+++ b/Documentation/PCI/boot-interrupts.rst
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Conditions
==========
The use of threaded interrupts is the most likely condition to trigger
-this problem today. Threaded interrupts may not be reenabled after the IRQ
+this problem today. Threaded interrupts may not be re-enabled after the IRQ
handler wakes. These "one shot" conditions mean that the threaded interrupt
needs to keep the interrupt line masked until the threaded handler has run.
Especially when dealing with high data rate interrupts, the thread needs to
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists