[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:38:26 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
Cc: nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] badblocks: avoid checking invalid range in
badblocks_check()
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 08:28:20 +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> If prev_badblocks() returns '-1', it means no valid badblocks record
> before the checking range. It doesn't make sense to check whether
> the input checking range is overlapped with the non-existed invalid
> front range.
>
> This patch checkes whether 'prev >= 0' is true before calling
> overlap_front(), to void such invalid operations.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] badblocks: avoid checking invalid range in badblocks_check()
commit: 146e843f6b09271233c021b1677e561b7dc16303
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists