[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0eef6feb-4775-4249-af74-9fccb093b6bc@kernel.dk>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:38:52 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
Cc: nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Block Devices <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] badblocks: avoid checking invalid range in
badblocks_check()
On 12/23/23 5:32 PM, Coly Li wrote:
>> 2023?12?24? 08:28?Coly Li <colyli@...e.de> ???
>>
>> If prev_badblocks() returns '-1', it means no valid badblocks record
>> before the checking range. It doesn't make sense to check whether
>> the input checking range is overlapped with the non-existed invalid
>> front range.
>>
>> This patch checkes whether 'prev >= 0' is true before calling
>> overlap_front(), to void such invalid operations.
>>
>> Fixes: 3ea3354cb9f0 ("badblocks: improve badblocks_check() for multiple ranges handling")
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/nvdimm/3035e75a-9be0-4bc3-8d4a-6e52c207f277@leemhuis.info/
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> Cc: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>
>> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
>> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
>> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
>> Cc: Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
>> Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> block/badblocks.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Is it possible to take this fix into 6.7 still? Thanks in advance.
Yep, we're still a few weeks out, so not a problem.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists