linux-kernel - [PATCH 04/10] clk: ti: Less function calls in ti_fapll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee5499f6-e06f-4b6a-9483-b73646660117@web.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 17:42:19 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
 Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cocci@...ia.fr
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] clk: ti: Less function calls in ti_fapll_setup() after
 error detection

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:55:44 +0100

The kfree() function was called in some cases by
the ti_fapll_setup() function during error handling
even if the passed variable contained a null pointer.

* Adjust jump targets.

* Delete two condition checks which became unnecessary
  with this refactoring.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
index 2db3fc4a443e..e9956e3ccd65 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
@@ -546,11 +546,11 @@ static void __init ti_fapll_setup(struct device_node *node)
 				   MAX_FAPLL_OUTPUTS + 1,
 				   GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!fd->outputs.clks)
-		goto free;
+		goto free_fd;

 	init = kzalloc(sizeof(*init), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!init)
-		goto free;
+		goto free_clks;

 	init->ops = &ti_fapll_ops;
 	name = ti_dt_clk_name(node);
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void __init ti_fapll_setup(struct device_node *node)
 	init->num_parents = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
 	if (init->num_parents != 2) {
 		pr_err("%pOFn must have two parents\n", node);
-		goto free;
+		goto free_init;
 	}

 	of_clk_parent_fill(node, parent_name, 2);
@@ -568,19 +568,19 @@ static void __init ti_fapll_setup(struct device_node *node)
 	fd->clk_ref = of_clk_get(node, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(fd->clk_ref)) {
 		pr_err("%pOFn could not get clk_ref\n", node);
-		goto free;
+		goto free_init;
 	}

 	fd->clk_bypass = of_clk_get(node, 1);
 	if (IS_ERR(fd->clk_bypass)) {
 		pr_err("%pOFn could not get clk_bypass\n", node);
-		goto free;
+		goto put_clk_ref;
 	}

 	fd->base = of_iomap(node, 0);
 	if (!fd->base) {
 		pr_err("%pOFn could not get IO base\n", node);
-		goto free;
+		goto put_clk_bypass;
 	}

 	if (fapll_is_ddr_pll(fd->base))
@@ -653,14 +653,16 @@ static void __init ti_fapll_setup(struct device_node *node)

 unmap:
 	iounmap(fd->base);
-free:
-	if (fd->clk_bypass)
-		clk_put(fd->clk_bypass);
-	if (fd->clk_ref)
-		clk_put(fd->clk_ref);
+put_clk_bypass:
+	clk_put(fd->clk_bypass);
+put_clk_ref:
+	clk_put(fd->clk_ref);
+free_init:
+	kfree(init);
+free_clks:
 	kfree(fd->outputs.clks);
+free_fd:
 	kfree(fd);
-	kfree(init);
 }

 CLK_OF_DECLARE(ti_fapll_clock, "ti,dm816-fapll-clock", ti_fapll_setup);
--
2.43.0