[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0f00368-9985-4517-8019-010f744a0e39@web.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 17:44:02 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cocci@...ia.fr
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] clk: ti: One function call less in
ti_fapll_synth_setup() after error detection
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 14:05:41 +0100
The kfree() function was called in one case by
the ti_fapll_synth_setup() function during error handling
even if the passed variable contained a null pointer.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Thus use another label.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
index e9956e3ccd65..d4674ec3d7e9 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/fapll.c
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static struct clk * __init ti_fapll_synth_setup(struct fapll_data *fd,
synth = kzalloc(sizeof(*synth), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!synth)
- goto free;
+ goto free_init;
synth->fd = fd;
synth->index = index;
@@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ static struct clk * __init ti_fapll_synth_setup(struct fapll_data *fd,
free:
kfree(synth);
+free_init:
kfree(init);
return clk;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists