[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf231452-e1e6-44bd-bff4-c699d5f2a53a@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 10:02:28 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, festevam@...il.com,
helgaas@...nel.org, hongxing.zhu@....com, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...gutronix.de, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, kw@...ux.com,
l.stach@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-imx@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
shawnguo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/16] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add linux,pci-domain as
required for iMX8MQ
On 24/12/2023 05:29, Frank Li wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 07:40:28PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/12/2023 22:36, Frank Li wrote:
>>> iMX8MQ have two pci controllers. Adds "linux,pci-domain" as required
>>> proptery for iMX8MQ to indicate pci controller index.
>>
>>
>> Why it has to be required? Everything will work fine if skipped.
>> Otherwise please provide reason why it must be *required*.
>
> Next patch will use "linux,pci-domain" as PCI slot ID, instead compared
> with hard code register address.
>
> The below code will be removed.
>
> - if (dbi_base->start == IMX8MQ_PCIE2_BASE_ADDR)
> - imx6_pcie->controller_id = 1;
>
>
> when there are more than 2 controller, this compare logic will become
> complex.
>
> So after next patch, "linux,pci-domain" will be required.
Nothing in commit msg explains this. Why you cannot use some
auto-incremented values when this is missing?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists