[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d48f4c72-623c-446d-b015-ea822fa2fedf@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 10:06:53 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
festevam@...il.com, helgaas@...nel.org, hongxing.zhu@....com,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, kernel@...gutronix.de,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, kw@...ux.com, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: remove reg and reg-name
On 24/12/2023 05:34, Frank Li wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 07:43:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/12/2023 04:46, Frank Li wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 04:50:33PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 04:36:09PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
>>>>> snps,dw-pcie.yaml already have reg and reg-name information. Needn't
>>>>> duplciate here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Notes:
>>>>> Change from v4 to v5
>>>>> - add Rob's Acked
>>>>
>>>> Err, that was intended for patch 9, not this one. This patch should be
>>>> dropped.
>>>
>>> Sorry, will correct it.
>>>
>>> Actually I want to move it under Allof
>>>
>>> if compatiable string (A, B, C...)
>>> then
>>> reg-names:
>>> -const: dbi
>>> -const: config
>>>
>>> Differece SOC have difference reg-names required list. If split it, it
>>> will be easy when add new SOC. Needn't change two place.
>>>
>>> Let me update at next version.
>>>
>>
>> This patch should be dropped. Why do you remove entries from top-level?
>> Are they defined in other schema?
>
> pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml already define it.
Indeed I see you wrote it in commit msg. However snps,dwc-pcie has it in
an unconstrained way. Nothing in commit msg suggests there are
constrains somewhere.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists