[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63d93850-e88b-4311-accb-e7fa9a89d44f@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 20:05:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
festevam@...il.com, helgaas@...nel.org, hongxing.zhu@....com,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, kernel@...gutronix.de,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, kw@...ux.com, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/16] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Clean up irrationality
clocks check
On 24/12/2023 19:32, Frank Li wrote:
> There are clocks and clock-names restriction for difference compatible
> string. So needn't irrationality check again for clock's miniItems and
> maxItems.
>
> In fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
It is enough to say that bindings referencing this file already define
these constraints for each of the variants, so the if:else: is redundant.
Two lines instead of ~20.
> ...
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
How did you get it? Please point me to the lore link. This patch
appeared in v5 and there was no response from Rob, AFAIK.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists