linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [crypto?] general protection fault in scatterwalk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4x31mT8TXt4c7ejJoDW1yJhyNqDmJmLZrf2LxMt7Zwg2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 19:25:07 +1300
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, 
	syzbot <syzbot+3eff5e51bf1db122a16e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, 
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [crypto?] general protection fault in
 scatterwalk_copychunks (5)

On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 4:51 PM Chengming Zhou
<zhouchengming@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023/12/27 08:23, Nhat Pham wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 3:30 PM Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Again, sorry I was looking at the decompression side rather than the
> >> compression side. The compression side does not even offer a safe
> >> version of the compression function.
> >> That seems to be dangerous. It seems for now we should make the zswap
> >> roll back to 2 page buffer until we have a safe way to do compression
> >> without overwriting the output buffers.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I think this is the way - at least until we rework the
> > crypto/compression API (if that's even possible?).
> > I still think the 2 page buffer is dumb, but it is what it is :(
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it's a bug in `scomp_acomp_comp_decomp()`, which doesn't use
> the caller passed "src" and "dst" scatterlist. Instead, it uses its own
> per-cpu "scomp_scratch", which have 128KB src and dst.
>
> When compression done, it uses the output req->dlen to copy scomp_scratch->dst
> to our dstmem, which has only one page now, so this problem happened.
>
> I still don't know why the alg->compress(src, slen, dst, &dlen) doesn't
> check the dlen? It seems an obvious bug, right?
>
> As for this problem in `scomp_acomp_comp_decomp()`, this patch below
> should fix it. I will set up a few tests to check later.
>
> Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/crypto/scompress.c b/crypto/scompress.c
> index 442a82c9de7d..e654a120ae5a 100644
> --- a/crypto/scompress.c
> +++ b/crypto/scompress.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static int scomp_acomp_comp_decomp(struct acomp_req *req, int dir)
>         struct crypto_scomp *scomp = *tfm_ctx;
>         void **ctx = acomp_request_ctx(req);
>         struct scomp_scratch *scratch;
> +       unsigned int dlen;
>         int ret;
>
>         if (!req->src || !req->slen || req->slen > SCOMP_SCRATCH_SIZE)
> @@ -128,6 +129,8 @@ static int scomp_acomp_comp_decomp(struct acomp_req *req, int dir)
>         if (!req->dlen || req->dlen > SCOMP_SCRATCH_SIZE)
>                 req->dlen = SCOMP_SCRATCH_SIZE;
>
> +       dlen = req->dlen;
> +
>         scratch = raw_cpu_ptr(&scomp_scratch);
>         spin_lock(&scratch->lock);
>
> @@ -145,6 +148,9 @@ static int scomp_acomp_comp_decomp(struct acomp_req *req, int dir)
>                                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>                                 goto out;
>                         }
> +               } else if (req->dlen > dlen) {
> +                       ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                       goto out;
>                 }

This can't fix the problem as crypto_scomp_compress() has written overflow data.

BTW, in many cases, hardware-accelerators drivers/crypto can do compression and
decompression by off-loading CPU;
we won't have a chance to let hardware check the dst buffer size. so
giving the dst buffer
with enough length to the hardware's dma engine is the right way. I
mean, we shouldn't
change dst from 2pages to 1page.

>                 scatterwalk_map_and_copy(scratch->dst, req->dst, 0, req->dlen,
>                                          1);


Thanks
Barry