[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYqJaXaFCKvuwu3H@memverge.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 03:06:01 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org, corbet@....net, rakie.kim@...com,
hyeongtak.ji@...com, honggyu.kim@...com, vtavarespetr@...ron.com,
peterz@...radead.org, jgroves@...ron.com, ravis.opensrc@...ron.com,
sthanneeru@...ron.com, emirakhur@...ron.com, Hasan.Maruf@....com,
seungjun.ha@...sung.com,
Srinivasulu Thanneeru <sthanneeru.opensrc@...ron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] mm/mempolicy: introduce
MPOL_WEIGHTED_INTERLEAVE for weighted interleaving
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 02:01:57AM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> >
> > If pol->wil.cur_weight == 0, prev_node will be used without being
> > initialized below.
> >
>
> pol->wil.cur_weight is not used below.
>
disregard, i misread your comment. prev_node should be initialized, to
NO_NUMA_NODE. Will fix.
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists