linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 18/24] of: irq: add wake capable bit to of_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 11:21:14 -0700
From: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, 
	Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>, 
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/24] of: irq: add wake capable bit to of_irq_resource()

>
> > +             u32 irq_flags;
> >               const char *name = NULL;
>
> Don't know if OF style requires reversed xmas tree order. If so, this should be
>
>                 const char *name = NULL;
>                 u32 irq_flags;
>

I see both methods used. For example, of_irq_init() uses normal xmas
tree order. I'll leave it unless Rob says otherwise.
It is Christmas time, so I do want to honor the Christmas trees appropriately!