[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANg-bXCrR2FKSi6ik7LZBqTQz9=HDW=0cy7GZN0yaB0PsKKjkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 11:21:14 -0700
From: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/24] of: irq: add wake capable bit to of_irq_resource()
>
> > + u32 irq_flags;
> > const char *name = NULL;
>
> Don't know if OF style requires reversed xmas tree order. If so, this should be
>
> const char *name = NULL;
> u32 irq_flags;
>
I see both methods used. For example, of_irq_init() uses normal xmas
tree order. I'll leave it unless Rob says otherwise.
It is Christmas time, so I do want to honor the Christmas trees appropriately!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists