linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 21/24] device property: Modify fwnode irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANg-bXBwWXaJWv9gMtjYvRBnOaP3E8U1nh5-ScWOoyRayzn7Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 12:09:19 -0700
From: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, 
	Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 21/24] device property: Modify fwnode irq_get() to use resource

> A side note: in all files where you use ioport.h check if you actually included it.
>
> ...
>
> > -#include <linux/types.h>
> > -#include <linux/list.h>
> >  #include <linux/bits.h>
> >  #include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> > +#include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> Fine, but no. This file is still not using the iopoll.h.
> See the forward declarations below? It should be there.
>
> >  struct fwnode_operations;
> >  struct device;
>
> ...
>
> > --- a/include/linux/property.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/property.h
>
> Same comment(s) here.

I don't fully follow. Are you suggesting adding an explicit 'struct
resource' declaration as opposed to including ioport.h? If so, why? To
reduce scope?