[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANg-bXAPrhS9iYASSSXFJguYEvejL_NcgMCWCHU=6mvP9AstLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 13:33:14 -0700
From: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/24] platform: Modify platform_get_irq_optional() to
use resource
> > - struct resource *r;
> ...
> > + struct resource *platform_res = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num);
>
> This is quite unusual (as far as cleanup.h is not used and there is no place
> for it here).
Sorry, what's unusual? The declaration of a separate 'platform_res'?
If so, I introduced it because I wanted to avoid setting 'r' if
'irq_get_irq_data()' fails below.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists