linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] iommu/vt-d: Add iotlb flush for nested domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:42:53 +0800
From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
	"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, "jgg@...dia.com"
	<jgg@...dia.com>, "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
	"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>, "eric.auger@...hat.com"
	<eric.auger@...hat.com>, "nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com"
	<mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, "chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com"
	<chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, "yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com"
	<yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>, "peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "Duan,
 Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>, "joao.m.martins@...cle.com"
	<joao.m.martins@...cle.com>, "Zeng, Xin" <xin.zeng@...el.com>, "Zhao, Yan Y"
	<yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "j.granados@...sung.com" <j.granados@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] iommu/vt-d: Add iotlb flush for nested domain

On 2023/12/28 15:11, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2023 12:14 AM
>>
>>
>> +static void nested_flush_pasid_iotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>> +				     struct dmar_domain *domain, u64 addr,
>> +				     unsigned long npages, bool ih)
>> +{
>> +	u16 did = domain_id_iommu(domain, iommu);
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
>> +	if (!list_empty(&domain->devices))
>> +		qi_flush_piotlb(iommu, did, IOMMU_NO_PASID, addr,
>> +				npages, ih, NULL);
> 
> Not sure the check of domain->devices makes sense here. The outer
> loop is xa_for_each(&domain->iommu_array, i, info) which, if found,
> then implies certain devices behind this iommu must be attached to
> this domain.

yes.

> I wonder whether it's clearer to remove this function and just call
> qi_flush_piotlb() from intel_nested_flush_cache().

yeah, with above remark, it would be more clear to call qi_flush_piotlb()
from intel_nested_flush_cache().

>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Invalidation queue error (i.e. IQE) will not be reported to user
>> +	 * as it's caused only by driver internal bug.
>> +	 */
> 
> here lack of:
> 
> 	*error = 0;

yes.

>> +	if (fault & DMA_FSTS_ICE)
>> +		*error |= IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_VTD_S1_ICE;
>> +	if (fault & DMA_FSTS_ITE)
>> +		*error |= IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_VTD_S1_ITE;
>> +}
>> +

-- 
Regards,
Yi Liu