| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <d884fe7f-1198-476f-810d-c2153df2e897@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 21:35:32 +0800
From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"lukas@...ner.de" <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 2/5] iommu/vt-d: break out ATS Invalidation if
target device is gone
On 12/28/2023 4:30 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2023 8:17 AM
>>
>> For those endpoint devices connect to system via hotplug capable ports,
>> users could request a warm reset to the device by flapping device's link
>> through setting the slot's link control register, as pciehp_ist() DLLSC
>> interrupt sequence response, pciehp will unload the device driver and
>> then power it off. thus cause an IOMMU device-TLB invalidation (Intel
>> VT-d spec, or ATS Invalidation in PCIe spec r6.1) request for device to
>> be sent and a long time completion/timeout waiting in interrupt context.
> is above describing the behavior of safe removal or surprise removal?
>
>> That would cause following continuous hard lockup warning and system
>> hang
>>
>> [ 4211.433662] pcieport 0000:17:01.0: pciehp: Slot(108): Link Down
>> [ 4211.433664] pcieport 0000:17:01.0: pciehp: Slot(108): Card not present
>> [ 4223.822591] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 144
>> [ 4223.822622] CPU: 144 PID: 1422 Comm: irq/57-pciehp Kdump: loaded
>> Tainted: G S
>> OE kernel version xxxx
>> [ 4223.822623] Hardware name: vendorname xxxx 666-106,
>> BIOS 01.01.02.03.01 05/15/2023
>> [ 4223.822623] RIP: 0010:qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822624] Code: 48 be 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 49 85 74 24 20 0f 95 c1 48
>> 8b
>> 57 10 83 c1 04 83 3c 1a 03 0f 84 a2 01 00 00 49 8b 04 24 8b 70 34 <40> f6 c6 1
>> 0 74 17 49 8b 04 24 8b 80 80 00 00 00 89 c2 d3 fa 41 39
>> [ 4223.822624] RSP: 0018:ffffc4f074f0bbb8 EFLAGS: 00000093
>> [ 4223.822625] RAX: ffffc4f040059000 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX:
>> 0000000000000005
>> [ 4223.822625] RDX: ffff9f3841315800 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
>> ffff9f38401a8340
>> [ 4223.822625] RBP: ffff9f38401a8340 R08: ffffc4f074f0bc00 R09:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822626] R10: 0000000000000010 R11: 0000000000000018 R12:
>> ffff9f384005e200
>> [ 4223.822626] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000046 R15:
>> 0000000000000004
>> [ 4223.822626] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa237ae400000(0000)
>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822627] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [ 4223.822627] CR2: 00007ffe86515d80 CR3: 000002fd3000a001 CR4:
>> 0000000000770ee0
>> [ 4223.822627] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822628] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7:
>> 0000000000000400
>> [ 4223.822628] PKRU: 55555554
>> [ 4223.822628] Call Trace:
>> [ 4223.822628] qi_flush_dev_iotlb+0xb1/0xd0
>> [ 4223.822628] __dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x224/0x250
>> [ 4223.822629] dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x3e/0x50
>> [ 4223.822629] intel_iommu_release_device+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822629] iommu_release_device+0x33/0x60
>> [ 4223.822629] iommu_bus_notifier+0x7f/0x90
>> [ 4223.822630] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0x90
>> [ 4223.822630] device_del+0x2e5/0x420
>> [ 4223.822630] pci_remove_bus_device+0x70/0x110
>> [ 4223.822630] pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x7c/0x130
>> [ 4223.822631] pciehp_disable_slot+0x6b/0x100
>> [ 4223.822631] pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change+0xd8/0x320
>> [ 4223.822631] pciehp_ist+0x176/0x180
>> [ 4223.822631] ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.50+0x110/0x110
>> [ 4223.822632] irq_thread_fn+0x19/0x50
>> [ 4223.822632] irq_thread+0x104/0x190
>> [ 4223.822632] ? irq_forced_thread_fn+0x90/0x90
>> [ 4223.822632] ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xe0/0xe0
>> [ 4223.822633] kthread+0x114/0x130
>> [ 4223.822633] ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40
>> [ 4223.822633] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822633] Kernel panic - not syncing: Hard LOCKUP
>> [ 4223.822634] CPU: 144 PID: 1422 Comm: irq/57-pciehp Kdump: loaded
>> Tainted: G S
>> OE kernel version xxxx
>> [ 4223.822634] Hardware name: vendorname xxxx 666-106,
>> BIOS 01.01.02.03.01 05/15/2023
>> [ 4223.822634] Call Trace:
>> [ 4223.822634] <NMI>
>> [ 4223.822635] dump_stack+0x6d/0x88
>> [ 4223.822635] panic+0x101/0x2d0
>> [ 4223.822635] ? ret_from_fork+0x11/0x30
>> [ 4223.822635] nmi_panic.cold.14+0xc/0xc
>> [ 4223.822636] watchdog_overflow_callback.cold.8+0x6d/0x81
>> [ 4223.822636] __perf_event_overflow+0x4f/0xf0
>> [ 4223.822636] handle_pmi_common+0x1ef/0x290
>> [ 4223.822636] ? __set_pte_vaddr+0x28/0x40
>> [ 4223.822637] ? flush_tlb_one_kernel+0xa/0x20
>> [ 4223.822637] ? __native_set_fixmap+0x24/0x30
>> [ 4223.822637] ? ghes_copy_tofrom_phys+0x70/0x100
>> [ 4223.822637] ? __ghes_peek_estatus.isra.16+0x49/0xa0
>> [ 4223.822637] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0xba/0x2b0
>> [ 4223.822638] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x24/0x40
>> [ 4223.822638] nmi_handle+0x4d/0xf0
>> [ 4223.822638] default_do_nmi+0x49/0x100
>> [ 4223.822638] exc_nmi+0x134/0x180
>> [ 4223.822639] end_repeat_nmi+0x16/0x67
>> [ 4223.822639] RIP: 0010:qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822639] Code: 48 be 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 49 85 74 24 20 0f 95 c1 48
>> 8b
>> 57 10 83 c1 04 83 3c 1a 03 0f 84 a2 01 00 00 49 8b 04 24 8b 70 34 <40> f6 c6
>> 10
>> 74 17 49 8b 04 24 8b 80 80 00 00 00 89 c2 d3 fa 41 39
>> [ 4223.822640] RSP: 0018:ffffc4f074f0bbb8 EFLAGS: 00000093
>> [ 4223.822640] RAX: ffffc4f040059000 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX:
>> 0000000000000005
>> [ 4223.822640] RDX: ffff9f3841315800 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
>> ffff9f38401a8340
>> [ 4223.822641] RBP: ffff9f38401a8340 R08: ffffc4f074f0bc00 R09:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822641] R10: 0000000000000010 R11: 0000000000000018 R12:
>> ffff9f384005e200
>> [ 4223.822641] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000046 R15:
>> 0000000000000004
>> [ 4223.822641] ? qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822642] ? qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822642] </NMI>
>> [ 4223.822642] qi_flush_dev_iotlb+0xb1/0xd0
>> [ 4223.822642] __dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x224/0x250
>> [ 4223.822643] dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x3e/0x50
>> [ 4223.822643] intel_iommu_release_device+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822643] iommu_release_device+0x33/0x60
>> [ 4223.822643] iommu_bus_notifier+0x7f/0x90
>> [ 4223.822644] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0x90
>> [ 4223.822644] device_del+0x2e5/0x420
>> [ 4223.822644] pci_remove_bus_device+0x70/0x110
>> [ 4223.822644] pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x7c/0x130
>> [ 4223.822644] pciehp_disable_slot+0x6b/0x100
>> [ 4223.822645] pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change+0xd8/0x320
>> [ 4223.822645] pciehp_ist+0x176/0x180
>> [ 4223.822645] ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.50+0x110/0x110
>> [ 4223.822645] irq_thread_fn+0x19/0x50
>> [ 4223.822646] irq_thread+0x104/0x190
>> [ 4223.822646] ? irq_forced_thread_fn+0x90/0x90
>> [ 4223.822646] ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xe0/0xe0
>> [ 4223.822646] kthread+0x114/0x130
>> [ 4223.822647] ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40
>> [ 4223.822647] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822647] Kernel Offset: 0x6400000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation
>> range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
>>
>> Furthermore even an in-process safe removal unplugged device could be
>> surprise removed anytime, thus need to check the ATS Invalidation target
> I don't understand what this sentence is trying to say. what is "in-process
> safe removal unplugged device"? Are following words about safe removal
> or surprise removal?
Surprise removal for hotplug device could happen anytime, even the
user pressed attention button to tell the OS he requested a "safe removal"
and OS blink the led to say "OS is handling the safe removal", the user
could pull out the device (surprise removal) that moment and not wait
the blinking led to turn off and tells him OS completed the handling.
Thanks,
Ethan
>> device state to see if it is gone, and don't wait for the completion/
>> timeout blindly, thus avoid the up to 1min+50% (see Implementation Note
>> in PCIe spec r6.1 sec 10.3.1) waiting and cause hard lockup or system
>> hang.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>> index 23cb80d62a9a..76903a8bf963 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>> @@ -1347,6 +1347,7 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>> struct qi_desc *desc,
>> unsigned int count, unsigned long options)
>> {
>> struct q_inval *qi = iommu->qi;
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>> s64 devtlb_start_ktime = 0;
>> s64 iotlb_start_ktime = 0;
>> s64 iec_start_ktime = 0;
>> @@ -1360,6 +1361,9 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>> struct qi_desc *desc,
>> if (!qi)
>> return 0;
>>
>> + if (iommu->flush_target_dev && dev_is_pci(iommu-
>>> flush_target_dev))
>> + pdev = to_pci_dev(iommu->flush_target_dev);
>> +
>> type = desc->qw0 & GENMASK_ULL(3, 0);
>>
>> if ((type == QI_IOTLB_TYPE || type == QI_EIOTLB_TYPE) &&
>> @@ -1423,6 +1427,14 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>> struct qi_desc *desc,
>> writel(qi->free_head << shift, iommu->reg + DMAR_IQT_REG);
>>
>> while (qi->desc_status[wait_index] != QI_DONE) {
>> + /*
>> + * if the device-TLB invalidation target device is gone, don't
>> + * wait anymore, it might take up to 1min+50%, causes
>> system
>> + * hang. (see Implementation Note in PCIe spec r6.1 sec
>> 10.3.1)
>> + */
>> + if ((type == QI_DIOTLB_TYPE || type == QI_DEIOTLB_TYPE)
>> && pdev)
>> + if (!pci_device_is_present(pdev))
>> + break;
> I'm not sure it's the right thing to do. Such check should be put in the
> caller which has the device pointer and can already know it's absent
> to not call those cache invalidation helpers.
>
>> /*
>> * We will leave the interrupts disabled, to prevent interrupt
>> * context to queue another cmd while a cmd is already
>> submitted
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists