[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <799b2484-9103-466b-ab86-483beadaad87@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 15:37:05 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/guc: reconcile Excess struct member
kernel-doc warnings
Hi Andi,
On 12/28/23 08:40, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> [...]
>
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>> @@ -105,61 +105,67 @@ struct intel_guc {
>> */
>
>
> struct { } interrupts is missing here.
>
>> struct {
>> /**
>> - * @lock: protects everything in submission_state,
>> - * ce->guc_id.id, and ce->guc_id.ref when transitioning in and
>
> [...]
>
>> + * we start bypassing the schedule disable delay
>> */
>> unsigned int sched_disable_gucid_threshold;
>> } submission_state;
>
> Here struct { } send_regs is missing
scripts/kernel-doc didn't report any problems with those, but it does
appear (to me) to be a kernel-doc bug. :(
Thanks.
> But as for this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Andi
>
>> struct {
>> /**
>> - * @lock: Lock protecting the below fields and the engine stats.
>> + * @timestamp.lock: Lock protecting the below fields and
>
> [...]
--
#Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists