[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d0ecab9-73a3-44e5-8d5b-f4d4cc5a3baf@notapiano>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:33:57 -0300
From: NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, kernelci@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...labora.com, Tim Bird <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Add test to verify probe of devices from
discoverable busses
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 05:53:48PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I have no opinion about the patches themselves, but just a heads-up
> that "busses" may be regarded as a misspelling of "buses", e.g.,
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231223184720.25645-1-tintinm2017@gmail.com,
> I'm guessing because codespell complains about it.
>
> Git grep says there are almost as many instances of "busses" as
> "buses" in the kernel, so I don't go out of my way to change them.
> Just FYI, doesn't matter to me either way.
Thanks for the heads up. The online dictionaries seem to agree on "buses", so
I'll use that on the next version.
Thanks,
NĂcolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists