[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3271d300-74c9-4ef3-b993-a8ddeda6076c@suswa.mountain>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:45:59 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, kernelci@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...labora.com, Tim Bird <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Add test to verify probe of devices from
discoverable busses
Life hack: Don't put RFC in the subject. Especially if it's a v2 or
higher. No one reads RFC patches.
This patchset seems like a low risk patch to apply.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists