[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaCPtY=gjAxuQAQUxczBVniWPFBq8ZSM+DfE8v0nxafvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 18:50:26 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hoan Tran <hoan@...amperecomputing.com>, Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: dwapb: Use generic request, free and set_config
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:08 PM Emil Renner Berthing
<emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com> wrote:
> This way GPIO will be denied on pins already claimed by other devices
> and basic pin configuration (pull-up, pull-down etc.) can be done
> through the userspace GPIO API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
This looks like a nice case of a pure pin control back-end for the
generic DW front-end GPIO.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists