linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Add tas2563 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3933d97638cfe57de5f9651b1f9a168bf88e43a5.camel@irl.hu>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 21:18:06 +0100
From: Gergo Koteles <soyer@....hu>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>, Kevin Lu <kevin-lu@...com>,
  Baojun Xu <baojun.xu@...com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
  Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
  Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Add tas2563 support

Hi Takashi,

On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 17:59 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Thanks, I guess I'll take this series later for 6.8 unless any
> objection is raised from reviewers.
> 
> But, I'd like to hear clarifications of some points beforehand:
> 
> - Did we get consensus about the ACPI HID?  I didn't follow the
>   previous thread completely.
> 

The INT8866 is a (wrong) PNP ID, that should only be used by the owner
"Interphase Corporation".
Intel has also mistakenly used the INT PNP prefix in the past, and now
TI/leNovo.

>   Since those models have been already in the market for quite some
>   time, we'd have to accept "INT8866", I'm afraid.  But it's still
>   very important to know whether a similar problem can be avoided in
>   future.
> 
> - Will be the firmware files upstreamed to linux-firmware tree later?
>   Otherwise users will have significant difficulties.

Shenghao sent the two files to linux-firmware@...nel.org a few days
ago, but I think the "Allegedly GPLv2+ ... Found in hex form in kernel
source." Licence needs to be fixed before acceptance.

But even if it is not included in the linux-firmware package, it is
easier for users to put two files in place per OS installation than
patching the kernel.


Regards,
Gergo