linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Add tas2563 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:33:43 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Gergo Koteles <soyer@....hu>
Cc: Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>,
	Kevin Lu <kevin-lu@...com>,
	Baojun Xu <baojun.xu@...com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Add tas2563 support

On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 21:18:06 +0100,
Gergo Koteles wrote:
> 
> Hi Takashi,
> 
> On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 17:59 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Thanks, I guess I'll take this series later for 6.8 unless any
> > objection is raised from reviewers.
> > 
> > But, I'd like to hear clarifications of some points beforehand:
> > 
> > - Did we get consensus about the ACPI HID?  I didn't follow the
> >   previous thread completely.
> > 
> 
> The INT8866 is a (wrong) PNP ID, that should only be used by the owner
> "Interphase Corporation".
> Intel has also mistakenly used the INT PNP prefix in the past, and now
> TI/leNovo.

Yeah, and the question is whether TI / Lenovo recognize the problem
and will avoid such a failure in future again.

> >   Since those models have been already in the market for quite some
> >   time, we'd have to accept "INT8866", I'm afraid.  But it's still
> >   very important to know whether a similar problem can be avoided in
> >   future.
> > 
> > - Will be the firmware files upstreamed to linux-firmware tree later?
> >   Otherwise users will have significant difficulties.
> 
> Shenghao sent the two files to linux-firmware@...nel.org a few days
> ago, but I think the "Allegedly GPLv2+ ... Found in hex form in kernel
> source." Licence needs to be fixed before acceptance.

OK, that sounds promising.

> But even if it is not included in the linux-firmware package, it is
> easier for users to put two files in place per OS installation than
> patching the kernel.

Sure.


thanks,

Takashi