linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Let the sq_lock protect sq_tail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <76fb76cc-70d6-7a5f-7fcd-e8161ae72299@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:33:20 -0800
From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
To: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>, <bvanassche@....org>, <mani@...nel.org>,
        <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <junwoo80.lee@...sung.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar
	<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Asutosh Das
	<quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
        Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "Arthur
 Simchaev" <Arthur.Simchaev@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Let the sq_lock protect sq_tail_slot
 access

On 12/18/2023 7:32 AM, Can Guo wrote:
> If access sq_tail_slot without the protection from the sq_lock, race
> condition can have multiple SQEs copied to duplicate SQE slot(s), which can
> lead to multiple incredible stability issues. Fix it by moving the *dest
> initialization, in ufshcd_send_command(), back under protection from the
> sq_lock.
> 
> Fixes: 3c85f087faec ("scsi: ufs: mcq: Use pointer arithmetic in ufshcd_send_command()")
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index ae9936f..2994aac 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -2274,9 +2274,10 @@ void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag,
>   	if (is_mcq_enabled(hba)) {
>   		int utrd_size = sizeof(struct utp_transfer_req_desc);
>   		struct utp_transfer_req_desc *src = lrbp->utr_descriptor_ptr;
> -		struct utp_transfer_req_desc *dest = hwq->sqe_base_addr + hwq->sq_tail_slot;
> +		struct utp_transfer_req_desc *dest;
>   
>   		spin_lock(&hwq->sq_lock);
> +		dest = hwq->sqe_base_addr + hwq->sq_tail_slot;
>   		memcpy(dest, src, utrd_size);
>   		ufshcd_inc_sq_tail(hwq);
>   		spin_unlock(&hwq->sq_lock);

Reviewed and Tested-by: Bao D. Nguyen <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>