linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:11:59 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
 Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused
 code

Hi Rafael,

On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more
>> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from
>> the thermal netlink library.
>>
>> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details.
> 
> No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I
> would like to get it into 6.8.
> 
> Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic.
> 
> Thanks!
> 

I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK.
I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you
like.

Regards,
Lukasz