linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:53:58 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused
 code

Hi Rafael,

On 02/01/2024 14:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more
>> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from
>> the thermal netlink library.
>>
>> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details.
> 
> No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I
> would like to get it into 6.8.
> 
> Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic.

I did not have time to review them properly and I'm OoO until next week. 
Is it possible to wait for the next time so I can review them ?

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog