[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jcaa8S7g+kKCC9yHHW-7BN0TLWZecOhdNMpHWYFExgHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:24:13 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused code
Hi Lukasz,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Everyone,
> >>
> >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more
> >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from
> >> the thermal netlink library.
> >>
> >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details.
> >
> > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I
> > would like to get it into 6.8.
> >
> > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK.
> I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you
> like.
Well, if you can allocate some time for that, it would be appreciated!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists