linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:26:22 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, 
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused code

Hi Daniel,

On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:54 AM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 02/01/2024 14:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Everyone,
> >>
> >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more
> >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from
> >> the thermal netlink library.
> >>
> >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details.
> >
> > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I
> > would like to get it into 6.8.
> >
> > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic.
>
> I did not have time to review them properly and I'm OoO until next week.
> Is it possible to wait for the next time so I can review them ?

I can defer them a few days of course, but if Lukasz can review them
in the meantime, I think that should be sufficient?