linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <062556a9-bf24-4f92-9c37-1723984c5127@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:14:18 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
 Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused
 code

On 1/3/24 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more
>>>> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from
>>>> the thermal netlink library.
>>>>
>>>> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details.
>>>
>>> No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I
>>> would like to get it into 6.8.
>>>
>>> Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK.
>> I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you
>> like.
> 
> Well, if you can allocate some time for that, it would be appreciated!

Sure, no problem, I'll do that today.