[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231227-topic-rpm_vreg_cleanup-v2-1-04c79c4f9166@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 21:18:37 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] regulator: qcom_smd: Keep one rpm handle for all vregs
For no apparent reason (as there's just one RPM per SoC), all vregs
currently store a copy of a pointer to smd_rpm. Introduce a single,
global one to save up on space in each definition.
bloat-o-meter reports:
Total: Before=43944, After=43924, chg -0.05%
plus sizeof(ptr) on every dynamically allocated regulator :)
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Remove unused function argument from rpm_regulator_init_vreg kerneldoc
- Do NOT add a mutex around the rpm assignment, talked to Dmitry offline
and we concluded it makes no sense
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231227-topic-rpm_vreg_cleanup-v1-1-949da0864ac5@linaro.org
---
drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c | 19 +++++++------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
index d1be9568025e..5461c03e2aac 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
@@ -11,11 +11,10 @@
#include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
#include <linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h>
+struct qcom_smd_rpm *smd_vreg_rpm;
+
struct qcom_rpm_reg {
struct device *dev;
-
- struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm;
-
u32 type;
u32 id;
@@ -70,7 +69,7 @@ static int rpm_reg_write_active(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg)
if (!reqlen)
return 0;
- ret = qcom_rpm_smd_write(vreg->rpm, QCOM_SMD_RPM_ACTIVE_STATE,
+ ret = qcom_rpm_smd_write(smd_vreg_rpm, QCOM_SMD_RPM_ACTIVE_STATE,
vreg->type, vreg->id,
req, sizeof(req[0]) * reqlen);
if (!ret) {
@@ -1384,14 +1383,13 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpm_of_match);
* @dev: Pointer to the top level qcom_smd-regulator PMIC device
* @node: Pointer to the individual qcom_smd-regulator resource
* device node
- * @rpm: Pointer to the rpm bus node
* @pmic_rpm_data: Pointer to a null-terminated array of qcom_smd-regulator
* resources defined for the top level PMIC device
*
* Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
*/
static int rpm_regulator_init_vreg(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg, struct device *dev,
- struct device_node *node, struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm,
+ struct device_node *node,
const struct rpm_regulator_data *pmic_rpm_data)
{
struct regulator_config config = {};
@@ -1409,7 +1407,6 @@ static int rpm_regulator_init_vreg(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg, struct device *dev
}
vreg->dev = dev;
- vreg->rpm = rpm;
vreg->type = rpm_data->type;
vreg->id = rpm_data->id;
@@ -1440,11 +1437,10 @@ static int rpm_reg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
const struct rpm_regulator_data *vreg_data;
struct device_node *node;
struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg;
- struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm;
int ret;
- rpm = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
- if (!rpm) {
+ smd_vreg_rpm = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+ if (!smd_vreg_rpm) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to retrieve handle to rpm\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -1460,8 +1456,7 @@ static int rpm_reg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
}
- ret = rpm_regulator_init_vreg(vreg, dev, node, rpm, vreg_data);
-
+ ret = rpm_regulator_init_vreg(vreg, dev, node, vreg_data);
if (ret < 0) {
of_node_put(node);
return ret;
---
base-commit: 0fef202ac2f8e6d9ad21aead648278f1226b9053
change-id: 20231227-topic-rpm_vreg_cleanup-fa095cd528ec
Best regards,
--
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists