[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5a2f511-2758-452d-b6ac-399262b3734d@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 16:31:01 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: qcom_smd: Keep one rpm handle for all vregs
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 09:18:37PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> - rpm = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> - if (!rpm) {
> + smd_vreg_rpm = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> + if (!smd_vreg_rpm) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to retrieve handle to rpm\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
It'd be slightly more robust to have a check here that we do get the
same RPM back if the variable is already set, just on the off chance
that something changes in some future system and we do end up with a
second RPM somehow.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists