[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c28ab577-35ad-45f6-8be4-08b441cdb50b@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:22:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun am642 som
and evaluation board
On 04/01/2024 12:01, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>> +
>>> + leds {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&leds_pins_default>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>> Where was it disabled?
> Nowhere. Better to omit status on new nodes added by new dts file?
Yes, you should not have any redundant status properties. okay is by
default.
>>> +
>>> + /* D24 */
>>> + led1: led-1 {
>>> + label = "led1:green";
>> Use function
> This board has no default function defined by labels or enclosure.
> Not sure what to pick for "function" property. Can I omit it and set only color?
>
> If so - should I drop label completely - or keep the "led1" part?
Then keep label.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists