linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7100: Add PWM node and pins configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJM55Z9DgFCwXjQGhe+urnOg-AkJMbQUR+biXKONQsRcup1GXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 05:18:45 -0800
From: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, 
	Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
Cc: William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7100: Add PWM node and
 pins configuration

Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Emil,
>
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 02:49:34AM -0800, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > William Qiu wrote:
> > > Add OpenCores PWM controller node and add PWM pins configuration
> > > on VisionFive 1 board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
> >
> > Sorry, I thought I already sent my review. This looks good.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
>
> Is this also an implicit Ack to take this patch via the pwm tree once
> the earlier patches are ready? Or do you want to take it via your tree?
> (Maybe already now together with the binding? If so, you can assume my
> Reviewed-by to be an implicit Ack for that.)

Yes, sorry. This is also meant to be an Ack from me.

I imagined the dt patches would go through Conor's riscv-dt-for-next branch,
but the pwm tree is certainly also fine by.

/Emil