linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7100: Add PWM node and pins configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240108-hubcap-stubble-ecf6ea34afb9@spud>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:31:17 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7100: Add PWM node and
 pins configuration

On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:18:45AM -0800, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Emil,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 02:49:34AM -0800, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > > William Qiu wrote:
> > > > Add OpenCores PWM controller node and add PWM pins configuration
> > > > on VisionFive 1 board.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
> > >
> > > Sorry, I thought I already sent my review. This looks good.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
> >
> > Is this also an implicit Ack to take this patch via the pwm tree once
> > the earlier patches are ready? Or do you want to take it via your tree?
> > (Maybe already now together with the binding? If so, you can assume my
> > Reviewed-by to be an implicit Ack for that.)
> 
> Yes, sorry. This is also meant to be an Ack from me.
> 
> I imagined the dt patches would go through Conor's riscv-dt-for-next branch,
> but the pwm tree is certainly also fine by.

idk, I prefer things to go as MAINTAINERS indicates, in case something
is determined to be wrong in the cycle where the patch is in the "wrong"
tree.

I suppose I could take the binding though, since I am CCed on every
binding patch under the sun... I'd rather an explicit ack in that case
though.

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)