[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAfSe-t3mj7ngwL_EZkp=YNWVdb1HhHjY6OY_xFWXieBp0vmOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:17:50 +0800
From: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To: wenhua lin <wenhua.lin1994@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] gpio: eic-sprd: Keep the clock rtc_1k on
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 10:11, wenhua lin <wenhua.lin1994@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 9:00 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:43 AM Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The eic debounce does not have a clock of rtc_1k in the sleep state,
> > > but the eic debounce will be used to wake up the system, therefore the
> > > clock of rtc_1k needs to be kept open.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +#define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_FORCE_CLK 0x8000
> >
> > BIT(15) ?
> >
>
> Yes, writing 1 to bit15 of the register can ensure that the clock of
> rtc_1k remains normally on.
Andy's comment means that you should use BIT(15) instead of 0x8000.
>
> > --
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists