[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZlfADa5_-NnK4UI@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 16:09:04 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Hasemeyer <markhas@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/24] platform: Modify platform_get_irq_optional() to
use resource
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 01:33:14PM -0700, Mark Hasemeyer wrote:
> > > - struct resource *r;
> > ...
> > > + struct resource *platform_res = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num);
> >
> > This is quite unusual (as far as cleanup.h is not used and there is no place
> > for it here).
>
> Sorry, what's unusual? The declaration of a separate 'platform_res'?
> If so, I introduced it because I wanted to avoid setting 'r' if
> 'irq_get_irq_data()' fails below.
Defining the variable in the depth of the code.
There are exceptions, but usually we follow the style that definitions are
grouped at the top of the {} scope(s).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists