linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] w1: add UART w1 bus driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 18:57:06 +0100
From: Christoph Winklhofer <cj.winklhofer@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] w1: add UART w1 bus driver

On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 05:56:34PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/01/2024 17:02, Christoph Winklhofer via B4 Relay wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > This patch contains a driver for a 1-Wire bus over UART. The driver
> > utilizes the UART interface via the Serial Device Bus to create the
> > 1-Wire timing patterns.
> > 
> > Changes in v4:
> > - rework baud-rate configuration: also check max bit-time, support higher
> >   baud-rates by adding a delay to complete 1-Wire cycle.
> > - dt-binding w1-uart: specify baud-rates for 1-Wire operations
> > - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240105-w1-uart-v3-0-8687093b2e76@gmail.com
> > 
> 
> You can slow down a bit. You sent v2 too late to be applied. Then you
> sent v3 and next day v4.
> 
> While I like approach to release early, release often, it does not
> necessarily apply to the bindings. Bindings should be complete, which
> means they should describe the hardware as fully as possible.
> 
> About the driver, you can develop it incrementally, it is a good idea,
> however since ~rc6 my w1 tree is closed. It will remain closed till next
> rc1 is released (merge window finished). Nothing will get applied during
> that time, so if you intend to add new features, better to send v5 after
> the merge window (instead v4 now, v5 tomorrow, v6 next week and then v7
> after rc1).
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Ok sorry, understood - thank you for the clarification.

Kind regards,
Christoph