[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB9BWhcCyJd5uYgFBEuY4kR+iPam68U6i21UUmhGX-hORH64Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 15:36:49 +0800
From: wenhua lin <wenhua.lin1994@...il.com>
To: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Cc: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] gpio: eic-sprd: Keep the clock rtc_1k on
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:26 AM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 10:43, Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com> wrote:
> >
> > The eic debounce does not have a clock of rtc_1k in the sleep state,
> > but the eic debounce will be used to wake up the system, therefore the
> > clock of rtc_1k needs to be kept open.
>
> It seems that this issue is not in the latest SoCs. I would suggest
> not changing for the time being.
>
OK, we will delete this modification on pacth v4.
> Thanks,
> Chunyan
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> > index be7f2fa5aa7b..bdcb3510a208 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > #define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_IC 0x24
> > #define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_TRIG 0x28
> > #define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_CTRL0 0x40
> > +#define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_FORCE_CLK 0x8000
> >
> > #define SPRD_EIC_LATCH_INTEN 0x0
> > #define SPRD_EIC_LATCH_INTRAW 0x4
> > @@ -223,6 +224,7 @@ static int sprd_eic_set_debounce(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> > u32 value = readl_relaxed(base + reg) & ~SPRD_EIC_DBNC_MASK;
> >
> > value |= (debounce / 1000) & SPRD_EIC_DBNC_MASK;
> > + value |= SPRD_EIC_DBNC_FORCE_CLK;
> > writel_relaxed(value, base + reg);
> >
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists