[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAfSe-ty=BgDNxST7q=+0CR6pshP4LhgmEPeZLmasiS2UkTjYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 11:25:32 +0800
From: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wenhua lin <wenhua.lin1994@...il.com>,
Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] gpio: eic-sprd: Keep the clock rtc_1k on
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 10:43, Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com> wrote:
>
> The eic debounce does not have a clock of rtc_1k in the sleep state,
> but the eic debounce will be used to wake up the system, therefore the
> clock of rtc_1k needs to be kept open.
It seems that this issue is not in the latest SoCs. I would suggest
not changing for the time being.
Thanks,
Chunyan
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> index be7f2fa5aa7b..bdcb3510a208 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_IC 0x24
> #define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_TRIG 0x28
> #define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_CTRL0 0x40
> +#define SPRD_EIC_DBNC_FORCE_CLK 0x8000
>
> #define SPRD_EIC_LATCH_INTEN 0x0
> #define SPRD_EIC_LATCH_INTRAW 0x4
> @@ -223,6 +224,7 @@ static int sprd_eic_set_debounce(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> u32 value = readl_relaxed(base + reg) & ~SPRD_EIC_DBNC_MASK;
>
> value |= (debounce / 1000) & SPRD_EIC_DBNC_MASK;
> + value |= SPRD_EIC_DBNC_FORCE_CLK;
> writel_relaxed(value, base + reg);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists