[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024010830-swimsuit-ferment-8b88@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:53:40 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bitmap tree with the tty tree
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:36:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bitmap tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
>
> between commits:
>
> 8a1060ce9749 ("serial: sc16is7xx: fix invalid sc16is7xx_lines bitfield in case of probe error")
> 3837a0379533 ("serial: sc16is7xx: improve regmap debugfs by using one regmap per port")
>
> from the tty tree and commit:
>
> e63a961be48f ("serial: sc12is7xx: optimize sc16is7xx_alloc_line()")
>
> from the bitmap tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the function updated by the latter) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Fix looks coks correct, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists