lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:53:40 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bitmap tree with the tty tree

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:36:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the bitmap tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   8a1060ce9749 ("serial: sc16is7xx: fix invalid sc16is7xx_lines bitfield in case of probe error")
>   3837a0379533 ("serial: sc16is7xx: improve regmap debugfs by using one regmap per port")
> 
> from the tty tree and commit:
> 
>   e63a961be48f ("serial: sc12is7xx: optimize sc16is7xx_alloc_line()")
> 
> from the bitmap tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former removed the function updated by the latter) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Fix looks coks correct, thanks.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ