linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bitmap tree with the tty tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240108115155.f2d2f1e5789d74b90d1b7426@hugovil.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:51:55 -0500
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Yury Norov
 <yury.norov@...il.com>, Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>, Linux
 Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bitmap tree with the tty tree

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:53:40 +0100
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:36:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the bitmap tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> > 
> > between commits:
> > 
> >   8a1060ce9749 ("serial: sc16is7xx: fix invalid sc16is7xx_lines bitfield in case of probe error")
> >   3837a0379533 ("serial: sc16is7xx: improve regmap debugfs by using one regmap per port")
> > 
> > from the tty tree and commit:
> > 
> >   e63a961be48f ("serial: sc12is7xx: optimize sc16is7xx_alloc_line()")
> > 
> > from the bitmap tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (the former removed the function updated by the latter) and
> > can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> > is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> Fix looks coks correct, thanks.

Yes, I confirm patch:
    e63a961be48f ("serial: sc12is7xx: optimize sc16is7xx_alloc_line()")

is now obsoleted by patch:
    8a1060ce9749 ("serial: sc16is7xx: fix invalid sc16is7xx_lines
bitfield in case of probe error")

Thank you,
Hugo Villeneuve