linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Crypto Engine support for SM6350

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:40:22 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>,
 Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Crypto Engine support for SM6350

On 5.01.2024 17:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add the compatible and nodes for the QCE found on SM6350 SoC.
> 
> Not completely sure how to fully test it but "kcapi-speed --all" shows
> no issues. Let me know if I can/should test this more.

I think I used `cryptsetup benchmark` with and without the ICE enabled
a couple years back. IIRC the CPU should be faaar faster but also chug
power while at it.

Konrad