[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CYA51QMVFQZF.3NEPC3R2QY2VM@fairphone.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 12:27:54 +0100
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, "Andy Gross"
<agross@...nel.org>, "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>, "Thara
Gopinath" <thara.gopinath@...il.com>, "Herbert Xu"
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Bhupesh Sharma" <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Cc: <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>, <phone-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Crypto Engine support for SM6350
On Mon Jan 8, 2024 at 1:40 PM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5.01.2024 17:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Add the compatible and nodes for the QCE found on SM6350 SoC.
> >
> > Not completely sure how to fully test it but "kcapi-speed --all" shows
> > no issues. Let me know if I can/should test this more.
>
> I think I used `cryptsetup benchmark` with and without the ICE enabled
> a couple years back. IIRC the CPU should be faaar faster but also chug
> power while at it.
Are you sure you mean QCE here (which this patch is about) and not ICE?
I'm not aware of them working together somehow but I wouldn't be
surprised if there's something since I don't know much of this area at
all.
Regards
Luca
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists