[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9daba002-2c49-49cf-a8e3-5b8350270df8@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 11:55:44 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Crypto Engine support for SM6350
On 1/9/24 12:27, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Mon Jan 8, 2024 at 1:40 PM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 5.01.2024 17:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Add the compatible and nodes for the QCE found on SM6350 SoC.
>>>
>>> Not completely sure how to fully test it but "kcapi-speed --all" shows
>>> no issues. Let me know if I can/should test this more.
>>
>> I think I used `cryptsetup benchmark` with and without the ICE enabled
>> a couple years back. IIRC the CPU should be faaar faster but also chug
>> power while at it.
>
> Are you sure you mean QCE here (which this patch is about) and not ICE?
I.. think I do. It's been a while.
>
> I'm not aware of them working together somehow but I wouldn't be
> surprised if there's something since I don't know much of this area at
> all.
No idea
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists