[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dcd80eba-e00e-4e29-b46f-9c972bf018f3@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 00:29:52 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] clk: qcom: reset: Commonize the de/assert functions
On 08/01/2024 12:32, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> -static int
> -qcom_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)
> +static int qcom_reset_set_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id,
> + bool assert)
Personally I'd not elongate the function declaration.
> {
> struct qcom_reset_controller *rst;
> const struct qcom_reset_map *map;
> @@ -33,21 +33,17 @@ qcom_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)
> map = &rst->reset_map[id];
> mask = map->bitmask ? map->bitmask : BIT(map->bit);
>
> - return regmap_update_bits(rst->regmap, map->reg, mask, mask);
> + return regmap_update_bits(rst->regmap, map->reg, mask, assert ? mask : 0);
and I'd probably do
u32 bits = 0;
if (assert)
bits = mask;
regmap_update_bits(rst->regmap, map->reg, mask, bits);
because I prefer for aesthetic reasons not to do ternary inputs like that.
However its up to you to change or not.
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists