linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mux: restrict node name suffixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 16:32:25 +0100
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mux: restrict node name suffixes

2024-01-09 at 16:23, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> 2024-01-09 at 09:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Make the pattern matching node names a bit stricter to improve DTS
>> consistency.  The pattern is restricted to -N suffixes to decimal
>> numbers.
> 
> Maybe I'm confused, but how is that compatible with the hex I2C
> address in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/adi,adg792a.txt?
> 
> 	&i2c0 {
> 		mux: mux-controller@50 {
> 			compatible = "adi,adg792a";

I'm was indeed confused. The @-tail is .* and the decimal digits have
nothing to do with the address. Sorry for the noise...

Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>

Cheers,
Peter